Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 3
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 14, 2026.
Public comments (8)
A nearby resident expressed concern that the four-story building is overwhelming for the neighborhood and asked about construction impacts and traffic on Conklin Street.
Planning Board - Oct 14, 2026 · 1:55:14 →Drew de Castro, living at 21 Conklin Street, opposed the four-story project, citing severe traffic exiting onto Fishkill Avenue, pedestrian safety, and delivery truck parking conflicts.
Planning Board - Oct 14, 2026 · 1:10:40 →Teresa Craft, a resident living across the creek, mentioned early morning noise from car drop-offs and criticized the appearance of the stair towers.
Planning Board - Oct 14, 2026 · 1:12:59 →Noted that while serving on the Fishkill Avenue Concepts Committee, four-story buildings were intended only for locations that do not impede view sheds or overburden residential traffic.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:08:54 →Expressed concerns about the fourth-floor height variance for Fishkill Avenue, noting a lack of detailed financial feasibility data and potential impacts on adjacent residential streets.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:00:48 →Stated that a four-story building would directly block his mountain views from Mead Avenue and urged the board to deny the variance.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:10:08 →Urged the board to vote no or defer approval on the fourth-floor height request until the City Council completes broader comprehensive zoning discussions.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:05:03 →Objected to the project's scale, traffic impacts, and financial hardship claims, noting effects on the nearby residential neighborhood.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:07:00 →