Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 19, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Expressed concerns about the fourth-floor height variance for Fishkill Avenue, noting a lack of detailed financial feasibility data and potential impacts on adjacent residential streets.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:00:48 →Urged the board to vote no or defer approval on the fourth-floor height request until the City Council completes broader comprehensive zoning discussions.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:05:03 →Objected to the project's scale, traffic impacts, and financial hardship claims, noting effects on the nearby residential neighborhood.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:07:00 →Noted that while serving on the Fishkill Avenue Concepts Committee, four-story buildings were intended only for locations that do not impede view sheds or overburden residential traffic.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:08:54 →Stated that a four-story building would directly block his mountain views from Mead Avenue and urged the board to deny the variance.
Zoning Board of Appeals - May 19, 2026 · 1:10:08 →